Investor Political Priorities - A Survey

Here we are, in the midst of a presidential campaign,plans and other self-directed gambling devices that
trying to select a new leader for what is still the mosthave taken the place of defined benefit pension plans.
economically powerful nation on Earth. The candidatesThese benefits cut into cash salaries, profits, dividends,
are kissing all the babies they can get their palms onand jobs provided, but are thought to be worth the
and smiling until their cheek muscles ache; but will theycosts in improved morale and retention. Mandating
be able to produce any of the changes they talkadditional or involuntary benefits for employees will
about? Do we really want them to?either cut something or raise prices. Related issues
90% of all Americans are investors and, as such, therethat must be addressed if health care and/or insurance
are issues that we need to hear about from the mancosts are ever to be brought under control: insurance
who would be king. None of our could-be leaders arefraud and tort reform. Known pre-existing conditions
addressing the issues that would allow us to achieveare not insurable risks that all insureds should pay for;
our financial goals. What we all want is to keep morethey are a social welfare concern that must be dealt
of what we make, and then to spend it as we see fit.with by government agencies.
It's not clear how the candidates intend to help us. Is(6) Tort Reform. Lawsuit awards in all areas must be
investor enemy number one a tax, a budding foreignlimited to amounts that are reasonable, and people
economy, a scarce commodity, the powerfulmust be held accountable for their own stupidity,
institutions, lobbyists, index funds, or the politiciansirresponsibility, and clumsiness. Potential suits should be
themselves?reviewed and possibly arbitrated by non-lawyers
While the campaigns focus on social issues, theybefore going forward. If you spill hot coffee on your
purposely ignore the economic realities of theirlap, be more careful next time. All costs, whether they
proposals. Politics and Economics are like oil and water;are insurance settlements or legal fees, find their way
they don't mix well, but both are necessities. The veryinto the prices we pay. It's just this simple, the deep
rich, and the corporations that spawn them, are thepockets are always our own.
biggest contributors to the foundations that fund social(7) Personal Income Tax Reform. Is it enough to say
change. Increasing their costs and raising their taxthat we tax pension and other retirement income,
liabilities is not going to increase the numbers of jobsincluding the sacred pittance from Social Security. The
they provide or the number of dollars they contribute.income tax needs to be revised, reformed, or replaced
Investor enemy number one is an ideology, a classby something. Eliminating the tax on all forms of
distinction between the super-rich and theretirement and investment income, including capital
not-so-comfortable-yet. You don't help the middle classgains, rents, royalties, etc. would have incredible positive
by stealing from the creative and successful. You doeffects (and would guarantee a Pennsylvania Avenue
so by increasing their "keep".address for eight years). The next administration could
Here's a list of candidates for the investor priorityearn another eight years by combining the various Flat
number one title. What do you think, and/or whatand Fair Tax proposals. That could double total tax
would you add? Please help me prepare a ranking thatrevenues, reduce price levels, create/save thousands
I can publish before the November elections.of jobs, and expand the economy.
(1) Social Security Reform. If I were to place $2,000(8) Regulate The Regulators. Every scandal produces
per year in an investment vehicle with a guaranteednew levels of regulations and additional cadres of
interest rate of just 3% per year, I would: accumulatesecret police who raise business costs in the name of
enough money to generate significantly more monthlycompliance with da law. Countless hours of
income than that provided by Social Security, developnon-productive time are mandated by broad-brush
significant cash values for my heirs, and have morepolicies and procedural requirements that do little to
spending money to pump up the economy. Nothingprotect the consumer--- in many cases they simply
need be risked in the stock market. My boss would beannoy the people they are supposed to assist.
able to hire additional workers, reduce prices, andFinancial services firms, for example, employ
increase dividends to shareholders (you). We can keepthousands of people to protect the firm from the
him from buying a yacht. Thousands of new jobsexaminers, not to protect the client from unscrupulous
would be created in an old industry and in supportingemployees. I've heard similar stories of the abuse of
areas.power that seems to be SOP in most regulatory
(2) Corporate Income Tax Reform. Eliminating theagencies.
Corporate Income Tax without enriching obscenely(9) Change Exchange Traded Index Funds. Index
compensated executives could redistribute enormousETFs have replaced plain vanilla mutual funds as the
amounts of spendable income to all employees,most popular form of speculation in the financial world
increase the likelihood of job growth in all businesses,today--- even more popular than sub-prime mortgage
reduce the costs of goods and services and, possibly,paper was just a few months ago, and with the same
their prices, and improve payouts to shareholders. Itrisks. These are glorified gambling mechanisms whose
would also reduce the amount of money spentprice movements have little to do with the economics
frivolously for tax reasons alone. We can regulate the(or economies) of the companies inside. Stock prices
transition to make it produce these changes, andare pushed up by demand for the indices, not by their
possibly to reduce the need for offshore outsourcing.fundamentals.
(3) Control Obscene Executive Compensation. This is(10) Restore the Up-Tick Rule. The up-tick rule that
nothing short of grand theft shareholder, and a basicapplied to short selling since 1929 was eliminated in July
source of the disrespect so richly deserved by manyof 2007; the markets have been feeling the impact
of today's corporations. Here's a great opportunity forever since. Theoretically, if not actually, unscrupulous
jobs in a new regulatory agency and for publicpersons could bring target companies to their financial
relations consultants. Arbitrary compensation limitsknees for their own purposes. In the wake of the
would be set for all public companies, and cash onlysub-prime mess, for example, it became difficult for
compensation would be allowed... no stock options,some companies involved to raise capital efficiently
unqualified pension benefits, deferred compensation,because of shorting tactics employed by hedge fund
vacation homes, golden parachutes, etc. Above aoperators.
certain level, 75% of the excess compensation in anyThis is my short list for the presidential candidates.
form would be donated in cash to the executives'Where they stand on these issues will certainly
favorite charities (directly from his or her paycheck)influence our economic future. Which of these is most
but the donation would not be deductible from anyimportant? I think that either Social Security Reform or
other taxes.the elimination of all taxes on retirement and
(4) Health Care Reform. Corporations provide healthinvestment income would have the biggest and most
care benefits because it helps them attract and retainlasting impact. What do you think? Really, let me know
employees. The same is true of the 401(k) savingswhat you think.