Book review on Finite Capacity Scheduling, Part I

Finite Capacity Schedulingactual fighting. It will be hard to fight waving sticks
by Gerhard Plenert PhD and Bill KirchmeirI metwhen B-1 Bombers are flying overhead; because by
Gerhard and talked with him for an hour at athe time you see them it is too late. Saddams army
customers office of one of our franchisees in Renonever had a chance since we had logistically won the
NV, which specializes in antique car restoration andwar before it started. Many battles in history, even our
maintenance. Gerhard was in the waiting room readingown civil war was about train tracks, supply and
what may have been Steven Hawkins, so we begantroops moving and feeding armies. The South had
talking. Imagine my surprise to find he had worked withfactories but found it hard to match the output of the
so many great companies in the early computer daysNorth. Larger Armies more guns, better stabilized
and with the automotive industry and many othercurrency. Innovation helped when they changed the
heavy Equipment Industries. Well since I had him therebullets and muskets, which could shoot farther with
for 1 hour, I barraged him with questions frombetter accuracy yet within months both sides had all
converting Space Energy (radiation and different lightthe same technology. In WWII Germans were working
spectrums into energy for our planet), to taking hison the hydrogen Bomb and so were we, at least
methods to the service industry. He too barraged meEinstein in his letter to the president indicated he
with questions on franchising, and later we talked aboutbelieved they were working on it when he asked for
the status of expert and we both laughed when wefunding of the Manhattan Project.Innovation in
found out we were both published in our fields ofManufacturing is important it helped Pirelli and Firestone
expertise. He admitted to writing books about hisand a few other tire manufacturers increased
subject so I ordered one and it shocked me that itproduction and leap frogged other technologies. But in
was $55.00 plus tax, after reading it, I was shockedthe end they all had the new technology and the real
that so much information on the reality of efficiencyproblem was who could build the most using the same
had ever been compiled in one place.First off I wouldtechnology. Cold War days, we simply out spent and
like to say that this book is not just for Manufacturingbluffed our way into winning the cold war. We may
Executives. I believe this book should be read by ourhave to do this again. We and the Russians both had
Military for infantry Logistics and moving forces into athe technology, and the resources, yet our great
hostile area for possible future engagement. It shouldeconomic machine was too powerful, probably due to
be read by NASA who occasionally has missedthe productivity derivative of a capitalistic society vs. a
appointments with Asteroids or launches. As NASAcommunist one. Even though none of the last three
learns how to attain multi-dimensional space travel it willparagraphs were in the book, it is necessary to further
be imperative to be a the right place at the right timepoint out why this book is so important.Another great
and to jump dimensions of space time otherwise itquote in the book;Behold the turtle who only makes
does not appear that travel beyond the speed of lightprogress when he sticks his neck out.I believe that
will occur in our life time. Computers are here to stayFCS is the solution to DaimlerCryslers dilemma in
and they can help us streamline efficiency and allow allEurope. Many countries there and their citizens favor a
business models to work in real-time. The new way ofcustomized car like a Dell computer delivered in less
manufacturing will be FCS and not Infinite Schedulingthan 30 days. Not the one size fits all car, which has
Backwards Pass (ISBP). Many aspects of this bookbeen Fords answer to profit taking in Europe.
dealt with the implementing of such a system and alsoTomorrow and todays new demands are for zero
with the reality of change and the fear and roadblocksinventory and immediate delivery with maximum
by conventional wisdomers.Great Quote;Newtons Lawefficiency; this can all be achieved with FCS. It also can
to manufacturing;For every expert with a perfectwork in training of new Army recruits, Navy pilots, and
solution there is an equal and opposite expert with athird world dictators. I believe car wash guys can easily
perfect solution.Now, there in lies the problem. How toimplement such a training version of FCS even though
get there. We all want the same results in government,no one has ever done it before. I also believe that we
we want utopia. In Economics we want stabilization, incan deliver real time services to our customers and
manufacturing we want the ultimate efficiency. So inallocate the necessary resources without wasting by
US governments we have Democrats, RepublicansGPS tracking, real time scheduling changes, labor,
and now we have CHADs. In Economics we havesupplies, equipment and crews. There is no difference
Friedman and Keynes. In manufacturing it use to befundamentally between labor at a manufacturing
Deming and TQM vs. the old way of thinking. Today itfacility and labor on a job site or multiple jobs sites for
is finite capacity scheduling (FCS) with softwarethat matter. A computer does not cry when you add
scenarios vs. other systems we have been taught,perimeters and does not need more food or coffee to
such as Material Requirements Planning (MRP). Supplyrun by the seat of its pants. It is not an emotional issue,
Chain Management (SCM), Schedule Basedit just is. Likewise a computer can calculate many
Manufacturing (SBM), Enterprise Resource Planningequations simultaneously, many can easily do 10,000
(ERP) all of which may appear to be viable on firstpossibilities per second. Still want to play chess with a
glance and work for a limited purpose if all things arecomputer? So does that mean the death of the
equal. However it does not appear that in the historyentrepreneur?Does that mean the Howard Hughes
of our Planet all things have ever been equal. In theorydays of innovation and flying by the seat of your pants
maybe, yet even on the most level of playing fields,are done forever? No there will always be prototypes,
they are skewed in one way or the other, by size,with no parts available yet, but what it does mean is
weight, strength, materials, wind, etc. There is always athat the entrepreneur can see his dreams come to
variable or a gray area (thank god otherwisefruition better because they may actually make a
attorneys would all be out of work eyh?). Incidentallyprofit. Does it mean that there will be no more
god did not make attorneys, otherwise they would stilldefective units? No, there will always be defective
be arguing if Adam and Eve should receive bellyparts from manufacturers who rely on sub parts,
buttons, and with no supreme court yet established towhich are not built in the same way. In Taiwan many
kick it back to a lower court the human race wouldcompany have experienced up to 35% more
never have come to be, during those last days beforeproductivity by only changing to the methodology of
the rest. Or maybe god got so tired of dealing withFinite Capacity Scheduling. So for America to
attorneys he had to rest.The book went into detail thecomplete its productivity without affecting its bottom
cost to expedite a job, and to deliver on promisesline we simply produce more with the same amount of
made by sales staff to acquire the order, which werelabor and manufacturing abilities. Think of it. Even if the
impossible considering all the other promises, whichdollar is strong a shit we can still sell for less because
were to be scheduled simultaneously. This causedwe are producing more with the same fixed base
over time and accidents and problems with compliancecosts. This means we can beat everyone still.Let the
issues with many agencies and still did not get all theinnovators innovate and the manufacturing Schedulers
jobs done so the customer base was in constantschedule using FCM systems and we will increase our
attrition. In wartime you need to expedite everythingoutput and win, even if we are all using the same
and one of the reasons that we beat the Germanssecrets stolen from our scientific communities. The
was because we built 96,000 aircraft to their 30,000book refers to Peter Drucker who stated that the true
that last year of the war. It was not that we hadmeasure of productivity is the output per unit of time
better aircraft. They had equally brilliant minds on theirgiven the finite resources. Yes I believe this to be and
side, and a hell of a head start. We of course had thehave always said the money is in the time and not the
desire to win. And we had the manufacturing and thecompleted job.This should be obvious to anyone who
resources as Germany was running out of everything.has bid a job to low and later completed the job
Charles Lindbergh warned us on his visit of thequicker than anticipated due to a new method of
Luftwaffe and their incredible planes and weapons ofoperation discovered upon commencing of the job.
war that the Germans already had pre-war (manySometimes it takes a few times to see how to
called him a NAZI sympathizer, which is hard argue, butactually do the work and then refine the technique, in
we should have still listened. He was definitelyactuality you are performing manual Finite Capacity
enthralled with their innovations). It truly was theScheduling even though it is the most elementary part
manufacturing and the great American push to moveof the actual FCS model. Now add jobs, labor, and
mountains that won us the war. Everyone participatedresources to the equation and then try to factor in all
and helped in the war efforts. Breaking the backs ofthe materials and times the materials, soaps, supplies,
the Germans was not easy, breaking theiretc are needed and what do you have? A complex
manufacturing abilities and running them out ofmess, which requires lots of thought and time.
resources is what helped almost as much as the